| Academic Open Internet Journal |
Volume 12, 2004 |
Bases of exponents, which are the eigen functions of
two discontinuous
differential operators
Sadig Guseinali oglu Veliyev
Nakhchivan Teachers
Institute, AZ7012, Nakhchivan, the Azerbaijan Republic
E-mail: nmi@nakhchivan.az
In studying approximative properties of eigen functions of some differential operators it is necessary to investigate the basis properties of the system of exponents with degenerated coefficients of the form
(1)
in spaces
, where
-are complex-valued on
functions;
coefficients
have the
following presentations
, (2)
are the sets of real numbers. Systems of the form (1) arise,
when we consider discontinuous differential operators of the first order

on
where
.
Following V.A.Ilyin [1],
proceed from the
generalized treatment of eigen functions of the operator
, which allows the consideration quite arbitrary boundary
conditions, i.e. under the eigen function of the operator
, corresponding the eigen value
, we understand any non-zero, piecewize-continuous function
with discontinuity points
, correspondingly, which is absolutely continuous on
and satisfies the
equation
almost everywhere on
.
Doing analogously as in the work of V.A.Ilyin and
E.I.Moiseyev [2], i.e. taking «a half» of the eigen functions of the operators
and
, corresponding the eigen values
, we have the system of the form (1)
.
For studying the basis properties of the system (1) in
need some statements
on basicity of classic system of
exponents
in the weight spaces
and weight subspaces. We note that the questions, conñerning the given theme,
were considered earlier in the works of V.F.Gaposhkin [3], K.S.Kazaryan,
P.I.Lizorkin [4], E.I.Moiseyev [5,6]. Trivial case, when
basicity in
of the system (1) was
considered earlier in the works of B.T.Bilalov (see, for example, [7,8]).
So,
suppose that the functions
satisfy the following conditions:
a)
are measurable on
, moreover, it takes place
,
where
is the norm in
.
b)
are piecewize-Helder
functions on
;
is the set of
discontinuity points of the function
.
Denote by
the jumps of the
function
at the points
.
Further
suppose that the function
is continuous from
the left side on
and
.
First of all
introduce the
necessary in the future denotations. Let
. Re-denote by
. Construct the correspondence:
and
. Define
(3)
(4)
(5)
where
is one-point set.
The following theorem is true.
Theorem. Let the complex-valued functions
satisfy the
conditions a), b);
have the
presentations (2). The numbers
are determined from
(3)-(5). If the conditions


are fulfilled, then the system (1) forms the basis in
.
Before proving theorem,
introduce some
notions.
Let
be usual Hardi class
of analytical functions in the unity circle.
introduce the
following weight Hardi class

where
is almost everywhere
measurable function,
are non-tangent
boundary values of the function
at the point
. Analogously the class
is introduced. Note,
that earlier such classes were introduced in the works of A.P.Soldatov (see,
for example [9]).
Let
(6)
. (7)
Consider the following conjugation problem in classes ![]()
![]()
(8)
Under the solution of conjugation problem (8) in classes
we understand any
pair of functions
the boundary values
of which on unity circle satisfy the equality (8) almost
everywhere and
is equal to zero on
the infinity. General solution of the problem (8) has the form
![]()
where
is general solution
of the corresponding homogeneous problem
(9)
is any particular
solution of the problem (8). Define the following analytical functions inside
and outside the unity circle:



Let
Formally
call the function
canonical solution of
homogeneous problem (9). In proof of theorem 3 the following lemma plays the
essential role.
Lemma. General solution of homogeneous problem (9) in
classes
, which has the order
on the infinity, can
be presented in the form
, if all conditions of theorem 3 are fulfilled, where
is polynomial of degree
.
Proof. Applying Sokhotsky-Plemel formulas, we have:
(10)
We present
in the form:
where
is continuous part,
is jumps function,
which is defined by the formula:

Let
where ![]()
.
Denote by

It is not difficult to note, that
. Again applying Sokhotsky-Plemel formula, we obtain:


where
.
Introducing the function
,
and using the denotations (3)-(5), boundary value
can be presented in
the form
.
As it follows from the
results of the work [10, p.79], the functions
are summable with any
degree
on
.
Taking into account (10) in (9), we have:
.
Introduce the function
:
As
has no zeroes and
poles for
, then the functions
and
have the same orders
on the infinity. According to the definition
. Moreover, as it follows from the results of the work [10,
p.74],
for sufficiently
small
. Consequently,
for some
From the other side
and from the
conditions of lemma it follows that ![]()
. As a result
and thus ,
Consequently,
is a polynomial of
degree
, i.e.
, and as a result
. (11)
According to
conditions
and
. From (11) and on Smirnov theorem
. Thus, according to definition
.
Lemma is proved.
Proof of theorem: Consider the function
, (12)
where
is canonical solution
of homogeneous problem. According to Sokhotsky-Plemel formula the boundary
values of the function
satisfy the equation
(8) almost everywhere and
i.e.

where
is any function.
Let
. It is clear that
. Denote by
.
Applying Sokhotsky-Plemel formulas and transforming, we have:
.
From this presentation and from theorem 8.4 [10,p.141] in follows
that
, i.e.
. As
, then it is clear that
.
As a result
for some
. From
it follows that
. Then from Smirnov theorem
and so
. Inclusion
is proved
analogously. From
it follows that the
corresponding homogeneous problem has only trivial solution, i.e.
non-homogeneous problem has unique solution (12).
Decomposing the functions
and
into the systems
correspondingly, we obtain that any function from
can be decomposed
into the system (1). Further, in the equation (8) as the function
we take
and
then we obtain
minimality of the system (1) in
. Proof of theorem is completed.
Theorem is proved.
References:
1. Ilyin V.A. // DAN SSSR, 1983, v.273, ¹5, p.1048-1053.
2. Ilyin V.A., Moiseyev E.I. // Transactions of Math. Inst. Of RAS, 1992, v.201, p.219-230.
3. Gaposhkin V.F.// Math. sbornik, 1958, v.46(88), ¹3.
4. Kazaryan K.S., LizorkinP.I.// Transactions of Math. Inst. of RAS, 1989, v.187, p.111-130.
5. Moiseyev E.I.//Different. Equations, 1998, v.34, ¹1, p.40-44.
6. Moiseyev E.I. // Different. Equations, 1999, v.35, ¹2, p.200-205.
7. Bilalov B.T.// Different. Equations, 1990, v.26, ¹1, p.10-16.
8. Bilalov B.T.// Dokl. RAN, 1994, v.334, ¹4, p.416-419.
9. Soldatov A.P. One-dimensional singular operators and boundary-value problems of functions theory, M., «Vicshaya Shkola», 1991, 208 p.
10. Danilyuk I.I. Lectures on boundary-value problems for analytical functions and singular integral equations, Novosibirsk, 1964, 226p.
Technical College - Bourgas,