|
|
|
|
IDENTIFICATION OF POTATO CELLS PLASMA MEMBRANE RECEPTORS TO RING ROT PATHOGEN EXTRACELLULAR POLYSACCHARIDES
Lidiya A. Lomovatskaya, Anatoly S. Romanenko, Nadia V. Krivolapova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
P.O. Box 1243, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia, Fax: (3952)510754; e-mail: phytoimm@sifibr.irk.ru
Key words: extracellular polysaccharides, potato, protoplasts, receptors, resistance, ring rot
Abstract
Extracellular polysaccharides /EPS/ produced by bacterial phytopathogens are known to take part in triggering or suppressing plant defense reactions. However, the functions of these compounds synthesized by ring rot pathogen - bacteria Clavibacter miñhiganensis subsp. sepedonicus /Cms/, are obviously studied insufficiently.
In this work the EPS Cms sorbtion on protoplasts isolated from mesophyll cells of two potato cultivars with contrasting resistance to this pathogen was studied. EPS were conjugated with a fluorescent label - rhodamine isothiocyanate.
EPS Cms were shown to be intensively sorbed on the protoplasts surface of susceptible cultivar. On the contrary, protoplasts of resistant cultivar cells bound EPS slightly.
It is proposed that a) in the plasma membrane of potato susceptible cultivar cells a great number of receptors to EPS Cms are present, first, to their suppressor components that inhibit plant defence responses; b) plasma membrane of cells of resistant cultivar contains a small but sufficient quantity of receptors to EPS elicitor compounds triggering the signal systems that induce resistance to ring rot.
Introduction
Pathogen recognition by plant takes place on the level of cell walls and plasma membranes via specific interaction of corresponding receptors with complementary pathogen determinants /1-3/.
There is a sufficient amount of data published confirming the existence on plasma membrane of plant cells of highly specific sites to pathogenic factors of various origin /4,5/. Plasma membrane receptors to some fungi toxins have been studied by now in detail. Receptors to fusicoccin have been found in all the higher plants studied, their molecular weights and affinity with ligand were determined /6-8/. On electronic microscopic level, localization on phytophtora elicitor receptors sites on the plasma membrane of celery and beans was demonstrated /9/.
At the same time ligand-receptor interactions during bacteria-caused diseases were obviously studied insufficiently. Gram-positive bacterium Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus (Cms) causing the tuber ring rot and wilt of the overground part potato plant produces extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) representing a mixture of heterogenous polymers of acid and neutral nature /10, 11/. Data on the presence of receptors to EPS of potato ring rot pathogen on the cell walls of potato suspension cultures were obtained /11/. It was also established that receptors of the cell walls of susceptible cultivar cells consisted of glycopeptides and sugars, those of resistant cultivar – of sugars only /11/. Biochemical methods have recently allowed to obtain the data on the presence of receptors to EPS Cms in the same cultivars of potato suspension cells of microsomal fraction enriched by plasma membrane fragments /12/. The present work was aimed at the identification by luminescent microscopy of EPS Cms receptors on the plasma membrane of potato leaf cells in two cultivars contrasted by resistance to the given pathogen.
Material and Methods
Isolation of protoplasts. Leaves of two-week-old in vitro plants of two cultivars were used for protoplasts extraction: Lugovskoi cultivar - resistant to ring rot pathogen and Luk’yanovskii - susceptible cultivar. Test-tube plants were grown in factor-state conditions on the Murashige-Skoog solid medium with the addition of hormones and vitamins /13/. To facilitate the isolation of protoplasts, the plants were first kept in darkness for 24 h. Then leaves separated from the plants were cut into fragments of 4-6 mm2 in Murashige-Scoog medium on 0.06 Ì Ê–Na phosphate buffer at ðÍ 5.8 and saturated via creating reverse pressure by enzymatic solution of the following composition with the final concentrations: 1% macerozyme R-10 (Serva, Germany-USA); 1% cellulase; 0,5% hemicellulase (Sigma, USÀ); 0,3 Ì sorbitol; 3 ìÌ CaCl2; 1% BSA (Reakhim, Russia); 0,06 Ì K–Na phosphate buffer, ðÍ 5.8 : Murashige-Skoog medium (1:1). Total volume of the medium amounted to 3 ml. For preventing the hydrolysis of the receptors’ protein part with proteases which could be present in the preparations of pectolytic enzymes used, as well as for blocking non-specific EPS binding with surface plasma membrane determinants 1% BSA was added to the medium /9,14/. Solutions with leaf fragments were placed in the bottles and put in the shaker at 280 Ñ for 3 h. Protoplasts were separated from damaged cells by means of filtration through a kapron fabric, and then, twice, 5 min each time, were washed by isolation medium without enzymes.
EPS conjugation with rhodamine isothiocyanate (RITC). EPS were isolated and purified from the cultivation medium of Cms strain 5369 virulent for Luk’yanovskii cultivar by the method described earlier /11/. 0.2 g of EPS were dissolved in 10 ml of 0.1 Ì of carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, ðÍ 9.3. 0.02 g of RITC were dissolved in the same buffer and volume. The solutions were mixed and placed in thermostat (270 Ñ) for 3 h. The conjugate obtained was purified from both salt and non-bound dye on the column (2.2 õ 40 cm) with sefadex G-25 (Sigma, USA) by eluating with distilled water. Eluate going out was controlled with the wave length of 206 nm using chromatographic equipment Uvicord (LKB, Sweden). The conjugate was evaporated to dry condition on the vacuum rotor vaporizer at 350 Ñ and stored in the refrigerator.
Protoplasts incubation with EPS-RITC conjugate, luminescent microscopy. 1 ml of 0.05% EPS-RITC conjugate dissolved in protoplasts extraction medium without enzymes was added to 1 ml of the obtained protoplasts suspension (104 cells/ml), then the samples were placed in the shaker and incubated for 1 h in the darkness. To remove non-bound conjugate the protoplasts were twice washed (10 minutes each time) in the isolation medium without enzymes and precipitated by centrifuging at 100 g for 3 min. The cells were watched in a luminescent microscope ML-2 (LOMO, Russia). Mercury lamp DRSH-250 was used as a light source. In order to observe proper and induced fluorescence a pervious light filter DBLF-15 (maximum permeation at λ = 400 nm) and a locking light filter YLF-18 (permeation at λ ³ 490 nm) was used. Non-colored protoplasts and RITC-treated protoplasts (0.05% solution in the isolation medium without enzymes) were used as control of induced fluorescence specificity. The objects were photographed using photo-nozzle FMN-10 (LOMO, Russia) and photo-film Kodak Academy-200 (KODAK, England). Two independent tests were done, with no less than 50 protoplasts analyzed for each variant.
Results and Discussion
With the light filter DBLF-15 pervious for blue-violet and ultra-violet parts of spectrum (range 340-480 nm), protoplasts treated with EPS-RITC complex fluoresced with blue light. The intensity of this fluorescence differed significantly in protoplasts of two cultivar cells. Thus, the surface of protoplasts isolated from the leaves of resistant cultivar plants (protoplasts-I) practically did not fluoresce (Fig. 1 a), whereas protoplasts isolated from the analogous plant tissues of susceptible cultivar (protoplasts-II) fluoresced fairly brightly (Fig. 1 b). The surface of control samples (protoplasts without incubation with EPS-RITC, and those treated with RITC only) isolated from both cultivars did not possess proper fluorescence (Fig.1 c, data shown only for protoplasts treated with RITC only). It is to be noted that chloroplasts present in significant amounts in cytoplasm (Fig. 1 d,f) fluoresced with intense red light (Fig.1 a,c). The results obtained allow a conclusion to be made that the receptors to EPS Ñms are present in the plasma membrane of potato cells. This can be judged by the sorbtion of EPS-RITC complex on the surface of protoplasts and by its binding possibly with the receptors given. The intensive EPS-RITC fluorescence on protoplasts-II (Fig. 1 b) proves the great number of receptors supposed to be on the plasma membrane of susceptible cultivar cells. In contrast, nearly complete fluorescence absence of this compex on the surface of protoplasts-I (Fig. 1 a) points to the essentially less number of such receptors in resistant cultivar cells. The similar results have been obtained for the plasma membrane fractions isolated from potato suspension cells the same cultivars /12/, and for the receptors of cotton plant cells to phytotoxin producing Verticillium dahliae in the work by Dubery and Meyer /15/.
The role of EPS in bacteria virulence has been widely discussed in literature /10, 16-17/. According to our data, EPS of Cms virulent strain demonstrated activating and suppressing action on the peroxidase activity of potato suspension cells of resistant and susceptible cultivars, respectively /18/. Thus, these compounds may act both as elicitors and suppressors of plants defence responses. This is probably due to heterogenous nature of EPS, i.e.: they consist of four-six components with molecular weights ranging from more than 700 to less than 1 kDa /10-11, 16/. According to the data published, depending on the degree of polymerization, EPS may show elicitor or suppressor properties /19/. The following facts can prove the possible role of EPS Cms in triggering elicitor-induced defensive responses of potato plants. We have shown that under high infection load by Cms unusual symptoms – local necroses on the leaves characteristic of hypersensitive response (HR) typical of incompatible interactions under pathogenesis in resistant cultivar take place /18/. Free oxygen radicals and hydrogen peroxide are known to be capable of initiating HR reaction /20/ in which realization of lipoxygenase and superoxidsynthase signal systems take part /21/.
Judging from the results obtained and taking into account the data published /22-23/ one can suppose that in the potato host-plant cell EPS-dependent signal may be generated: a) after EPS binding with receptors localized on the cells wall (for example, vitronectin-like proteins) and through the interaction of these complexes with plasma membrane receptors, in particular, via RGD motif /23/; b) and/or after EPS binding immediately with plasma membrane receptors. Elicitor and suppressor components of EPS Cms may compete for binding sites of the same receptors or, preferably, interact with receptors highly specific for each of them, as qualitative and quantitative compositions, at least of cell wall receptors, differ in resistant and susceptible potato cultivars /11/.
In the case of resistant cultivar, one of the reasons of its resistance to Cms may be the affinity of cell walls and plasma membrane receptors /11-12/ to elicitor but not to suppressor EPS components of the pathogen. Activation of such receptors present in a small, but sufficient amount for perception and transduction of signal, initiates defensive responses, one of which is HR. In contrast, receptors to EPS are present in larger amounts in the cell walls and on plasma membrane of susceptible cultivar /11-12/ and, apparently, have a higher affinity to EPS Cms suppressor components acquired over the period of lengthy co-evolution of pathogen and plant /24/. As a result, there is no "alarm" signal and defensive reactions do not get started up.
Literature cited
1. Sugiura T., Kiba A., Aoyagi M., Kato T., Ishinose Y., Yamada T., Shiraishi T. // Plant and Cell Physiol., 1997, v. 38, p. 1-7.
2. Cosio E.G., Popperl H., Schmidt W., Ebel J. // Eur.J.Biochem., 1988. v. 2, p. 309-315.
3. Shiraishi T., Yamada T., Ychinose Y., Kiba A. // Plant and Cell Physiol.,1997, v. 38, p. 11-15.
4. Shibuya N., Ebisu N., Kamada Y., Kaku H., Ito Y. // Plant Cell Phiyiol., 1996, v. 37, p. 894-898.
5. Protsenko M.A. // Biochemistry, 1995, v.60, p. 58-65 /in Russian/.
6. Korthout H.A.A.J., de Boer A.H. // Plant Cell, 1994, v. 6, p.1681-1692.
7. Aducci P., Ballio A., Nastra D., Fogliano V., Fullone M.R., Marra M. // Plant Hormone Signal Perception and Transduction / Eds. A.R. Smith et al., Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1996, p. 141-146.
8. Pertl H., Himly M., Gehwolf R., Kriechbaumer R., Strasser D., Michalke W., Richter K., Ferreira F., Obermeyer G. // Planta, 2001, v. 213, p.132-141.
9. Diekmann W., Herkt B., Low P.S., Nurnberger T., Sheel D., Terschuren C., Robinson D.G. // Planta, 1994, v. 195, p.126-137.
10. Westra A.A.G., Slack S.A. // Phytopathology, 1992, v. 82, p. 1193-1199.
11. Romanenko, A.S., E.V. Rymareva, V.N. Kopytchuk, E.G. Ekimova, A.M. Sobenin // Biochemistry, 1999, v. 64, p. 1370-1376 /in Russian/.
12. Shafikova T.N., Romanenko A.S., Borovskii G.B., Salyaev R.K. // Acad. Sci. Repts., 2000, v. 374, p. 139-141 /in Russian/.
13. Butenko R.G., Chromova L.M., Sednina G.V. // Indications of Methods for Obtaining Variant Cellular Lines and Plants in Different Potato Cultivars/ Ed. P.P. Berezhnoi, 1984,. VASKHNIL, Moscow, p. 28-31, /in Russian/.
14. Timmons T.M., Dunbar B.S. // Methods Enzymol., 1990, v. 182, p. 679-688.
15. Dubery G.A., Meyer R. // Plant Cell Repts., 1996, v. 15, p. 777-780.
16. Denny T.P. // Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 1995, v. 33, p. 173-197.
17. Metzler M.C., Laine M.J., De Boer S.H. // FEMS Microbiol. Lett.,1997, v. 150, p. 1-8.
18. Romanenko A.S., Lomovatskaya L.A., Graskova I.A., Salyaev R.K. // Acad. Sci. Repts., 1999, v. 368, p. 430-432 /in Russian/.
19. Ozeretskovskaya O.L., Romenskaya I.G. // Rus. J. Plant Physiol., 1996, v. 43, p. 743-752 /in Russian/.
20. Bestwick C.S., Brown J.R., Mansfield J.W. // Plant Physiol., 1998. v.118, p.1067-1078.
21. Tarchevsky I.A. // Rus. J. Plant Physiol., 2000, v. 47, p. 321-331 /in Russian/.
22. Nurnberger T., Wirtz W., Nennstiel D., Hahlbrock K., Jabs T., Zimmermann S., Scheel D. // J. Receptor and Signal Transduct. Res., 1997, v. 17, p.127-136.
23. Kiba A., Sugimoto M., Toyoda K., Ichinose Y., Yamada T., Shiraishi T. // Plant Cell Physiol., 1998, v. 39, p. 1245-1249.
24. Il'inskaya L.I., Basyukova N.I., Ozeretskovskaya O.L. // Reviews of Science and Engineering. Series Plant Protection, 1991, VINITI, Moscow, v. 7, p. 1-195 /in Russian/.

Fig. 1. Binding of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) of C. michiganensis ssp. sepedonicus (Cms), strain 5369, on protoplasts isolated from potato leaf tissue cells.
a, d – Lugovskoi cv (resistant);
b, c, e, f – Lukyanovskii cv (susceptible); a, b, d, e – treatment by EPS-RITC; c, f - control (treatment with RITC only); à-c – fluorescent microscopy; d-f – light microcscopy. Long arrows show chloroplasts; short arrows show vacuoles. The line is 20 m m.
Technical
College - Bourgas,
All rights reserved, © March, 2000